Is thee a way to surreptuously trigger false negatives, where 'politically sensitive' people are made to be suspect, then lured into surveillance - bank directors, corporate people, of which it is plausible they have other dirty secrets, such as untaxed incomes. If a few hundred big industrialists, investors and executives are implied in the kind of actions that bear the attention of intelligence surveillance on them, they'd be the kind of people that would get seriously pissed off if security agencies would then have to report drug abuse, excessive sexual deviancy, swiss bank accounts or ties with criminals. Let the fat cats then do the legwork for the normal people and lobby politicians for checks and balances.
Is thee a way to surreptuously trigger false negatives, where 'politically sensitive' people are made to be suspect, then lured into surveillance - bank directors, corporate people, of which it is plausible they have other dirty secrets, such as untaxed incomes. If a few hundred big industrialists, investors and executives are implied in the kind of actions that bear the attention of intelligence surveillance on them, they'd be the kind of people that would get seriously pissed off if security agencies would then have to report drug abuse, excessive sexual deviancy, swiss bank accounts or ties with criminals. Let the fat cats then do the legwork for the normal people and lobby politicians for checks and balances.